An Ultimate Guide to Rainbow's End by Jane Harrison

Jane Harrison’s 2007 play ‘Rainbow’s End’ invites its audience into the household of three Indigenous women as they struggle to realise their dreams in an era of racial segregation and dispossession.

Short on time and want a quick knowledge booster instead?

Enter Cram Mode

(We won't judge...)

Table of contents

Jane Harrison’s 2007 play ‘Rainbow’s End’ invites its audience into the household of three Indigenous women as they struggle to realise their dreams in an era of racial segregation and dispossession.  Set in the 1950s, Harrison backdrops the fight for housing rights and the Queen’s first visit to Australia to remind its audiences how little has changed since the establishment of Rumbalara. Alongside this political backdrop, Harrison constructs a coming of age story where Dolly’s personal struggle to retain control and agency over herself and her dreams serves as a representation of the story’s parallel political struggle for Indigenous sovereignty.

Synopsis

The play follows the Dears family, who live in a humpy on a riverbank near Shepparton, Victoria. Early on, Nan Dear explains that the government “forced [them] to leave Cummeragunja. Our home” (p. 15), and that this settlement is a result of displacement. 

When Errol Fisher, a white boy who has come from Melbourne to sell encyclopaedias, stumbles upon the settlement, a romance forms between him and Dolly. While she is aware of the near impossibility of their relationship, Nan Dear is even more sceptical of Errol and warns Dolly to “watch who [she’s] mixing with” as it’s “hard to tell a good man from a bad,” (p. 41). We later learn that her mistrust is born out of personal experience with sexual assault, and the result of her witnessing Ester’s abusive relationship with her white husband. 

At the Miss Shepparton Ball, a fight  ensues between Errol and Dolly’s cousins, and after their escape she experiences further pressure from Errol himself, who attempts to convince her to go live together in Melbourne. Dolly scorns at his promise of a “better life” and makes it clear that she would not leave her family behind. As he grabs her arm in one last attempt to convince her, Dolly breaks free and runs off, only to have her agency even more brutally taken away from her later in the night when she is sexually assaulted at the hands of her cousin. 

In the final act the three women have moved into Rumbalara, yet find the housing bleak and ‘unloveable.’ It is also revealed that Dolly is pregnant with the child of her assailant. Meanwhile, Gladys pursues her own dreams and employs Errol’s help to learn how to read .

In the final scene, at a general meeting to discuss Aboriginal housing rights, Gladys accepts her daughter’s choice to become a nurse despite previous efforts to get her a banking job. Nan Dear also clears up her misunderstandings with Errol and encourages Dolly to give him a second chance after seeing his transformation of character. Finally, Gladys delivers a powerful speech in her father’s absence, in which she demands better housing conditions, the right for Aboriginal people to make their own decisions, and an end to segregation. 

Themes

Family 

Perhaps unsurprisingly, one of the play’s central themes is family. The text explores culture-specific understandings of family and contrasts how family is viewed and valued differently across Aboriginal and Anglo-Saxon culture. Whereas for Nan Dear it is shocking that Dolly’s family tree is not expected to include ‘cousins,’ for Anglo-Saxons in the 1950s like Errol, family seems to be a transient unit which one grows up from in order to form their own family, rather than a community which spans across generations. More broadly, family is explored paradoxically as a source of support and entrapment, especially when it becomes clear that wishes and dreams can clash with family expectations and individuals are forced to make difficult choices between themselves and their families. Furthermore, despite family being an unbreakable bond, Harrison does not shy away from critiquing the darker abuses of power (namely between men and women) that continue to plague families from both Aboriginal and white communities. 

Dreams

Harrison’s play intertwines the dreams and hopes of individual characters with the playwright’s own hopes and dreams for the future of Australia and Indigenous rights. In the microcosm of the family unit, dreams are created, contested, and oftentimes crushed by reality. Gladys’ dream for better Aboriginal housing and her hope to see this realised through the construction of Rumbalara is shattered upon realisation that Rumbalara is not a good enough solution. Dolly’s dreams especially seem to be constantly under threat, whether due to societal barriers or pressures from within her family. It appears that Nan Dear’s cynicism and pessimism, fuelled by past trauma, become a hindrance to the realisation of Dolly’s dreams. This cynicism is treated with empathy by the playwright, yet simultaneously aims to prompt the audience to question how the hopelessness and distrust that comes with generational and personal trauma can prevent progress towards a better future. 

Racism and Segregation

Harrison explores racism in the 1950s as taking numerous forms; throughout the play we witness harmful racist attitudes of paternalism, assimilation and segregation

The first, paternalism, describes an infantilising view of Indigenous people as incapable of looking after themselves and thus needing the protection of white people or the government; we see this in the way the Aboriginal community in ‘Rainbow’s End’ is constantly surveilled by white authorities (such as the Inspector) and in the memories of Cummeragunja alluded to by Nan Dear, where the Aboriginal Protection Act of 1909 had placed the Aboriginal community under strict control with the excuse of ‘protecting’ and taking care of them. Errol’s desires to protect Dolly and give her a ‘better life’ may also be interpreted as a reflection of paternalistic attitudes, with the exchange meant to symbolise how paternalism takes away the agency of Indigenous people like Dolly. 

The playwright also exposes the indignant and traumatic consequences of assimilation. The Rent Collector and Inspector are perhaps the most obvious embodiments of assimilationist values, and are both represented as threats to the Dears family; specifically, they always appear as a threat to the children (first Dolly, and then Dolly’s child), as the playwright alludes to the history of the Stolen Generation, one of the greatest consequences of assimilation policies between the 1800s-1970s. Gladys’ rhetorical question, “why do we have to prove we can live like whitefellas, before we get the same opportunities?,” further illustrates how assimilation forced Indigenous people to leave behind their culture to reap the scarce rewards offered by white Australian society. 

At the same time, Australian society continued to be highly segregated, something which Harrison focuses on through the experiences of Nan Dear, who is served last at the butcher, or through Errol and Dolly’s relationship, which Dolly “knows cannot work” (p. 55). The hessian fence also appears as a symbol of segregation, preventing the Queen from seeing the humpies of the Aboriginal settlement. Furthermore, Harrison also critiques the scapegoating of Indigenous people for the living conditions imposed upon them through segregationist policies; this is best seen through Gladys’ sarcastic remark “as if we chose to live on a floodplain” (p. 120). 

Sovereignty 

Sovereignty also takes the centre stage within the play’s thematic realm. Set in the only commonwealth nation which to this day lacks a formal treaty with its First Nations peoples, Rainbow's End arguably seems to emphasise continuity rather than change. The play continuously alludes to the bitter irony of Indigenous people being treated like foreigners on their own lands, seen when Gladys objects “I’m not an interloper - I belong here - this is my land!” (p. 120). Through the voice of the radio broadcaster, who proclaims Centennial Park to be the “birthplace of the nation” (p. 15), the playwright exposes the pervasiveness of the myth of terra nullius, the false and racist belief that civilisation in Australia did not exist prior to British colonisation. From the regular inspections the Aboriginal settlement is subjected to, to its eventual bulldozing by the end of the play, it is clear that both the characters and the land are at “the whim of government, at the mercy of Protection Boards, at the vagary of landlords and property owners'' (p. 48). Gladys’ tautology here perhaps speaks best to the numerous institutions that Harrison condemns as robbing the agency and independence of First Nations peoples. 

Gender and sovereignty

While we often think of sovereignty as associated with political rights, Harrison also navigates the theme of sovereignty in relation to Indigenous women’s bodies. An intersectional analysis is pertinent as female characters suffer the intersecting consequences of being mistreated both on account of their gender identity and race. Harrison exposes Australian society as governed by misogyny as well as racism, resulting in a culture which produced relentless violence against Indigenous women such as Nan Dear, Ester, and Dolly. In their experiences of abuse, these women are denied autonomy over their own bodies, in two cases by white men. Nonetheless, Harrison elucidates that violence against women can also be indiscriminate, as Dolly is assaulted by her own cousin – in all of these circumstances, the author exhibits the violence of the patriarchy. Even when sexual assault is not present, such as the scene in which Errol grabs Dolly’s arm, the tense stichomythia of their dialogue and the stormy sound design aim to emphasise Dolly’s loss of agency and autonomy as she attempts to wrestle back control. Thus, in exploring intersections of race and gender, Harrison navigates the theme of sovereignty at a personal level, condemning the way it has been denied to Indigenous women.

Innocence and Coming of Age 

Given that one of the protagonists (if not the protagonist) is seventeen year old Dolly, we may also consider ‘Rainbow’s End’ to be a coming of age story. One of Dolly’s central struggles is to be treated like a ‘woman,’ and to not have her family (especially Nan Dear) hide matters from her. Towards the end of the play, she wins this privilege yet the stage directions suggest it has come at a cost, the loss of innocence: “DOLLY smiles – she’s finally a woman in NAN’s eyes. But her smile is tinged with sadness” (p. ??) It thus appears that the playwright critiques the way in which the rite of passage into womanhood is associated with pain rather than joy, as the parallels between Dolly and Nan Dear suggest that they represent a common reality. 

Overall, ‘Rainbow’s End’ offers an opportunity to reflect on what it means to dream about the future as a First Nations person in Australia, and on the difficulties of fighting for that future. We hope this study guide has helped you better understand the most prominent themes of the play, and how Jane Harrison has chosen to represent this national struggle within the microsetting of a family. 

Important Stylistic Features

As outlined in the VCAA guidelines, an A+ text response essay needs to:

  • Demonstrates a close and perceptive reading of the text, exploring complexities of its concepts and construction 
  • Demonstrates an understanding of the implications of the topic, using an appropriate strategy for dealing with it, and exploring its complexity from the basis of the text 
  • Develops a cogent, controlled and well-substantiated discussion using precise and expressive language
A thorough understanding of the play’s construction, including its use of setting, lighting, sound, will aid the development of arguments and improve the quality of your essays. It is also common amongst mid-level responses that metalanguage is not correctly used or lacks range. The list below provides a brief definition of different stylistic features, with examples included illustrating how particular devices can be analysed to convey meaning.

Setting

Setting creates a sense of place, so it is important to reflect on how Harrison’s sets reflect or emphasise ideas about land, history and heritage. 

  • Rough countryside dwellings are juxtaposed against white, pristine and yet ‘unloveable’ spaces as audiences are invited to temporarily occupy the oppressive places that Indigenous people struggled to make home. 
  • A key (and tragic) turning point in Dolly's life is set against the backdrop of a dramatic, thundering storm, reflecting the characters' turbulent struggle and loss of innocence.

Lighting

Lighting is also employed strategically throughout, both for dramatic purposes and importantly, to signify the characters’ ‘dream sequences.’

  • The dreamy lighting of the 'dream' sequences signifies their distance and detachment from reality - these are hopes that are often unrealisable within the limits of the play and the characters' societies, yet they bring joy to those who dream them. 

Sound

Sound features heavily in the play, both in diegetic and non-diegetic forms. Diegetic sounds such as loud and rough noises, or rain and thunder, intensify scenes of conflict and the inner psychological turmoil of the characters. In contrast, non-diegetic sound such as the use of the song ‘Que sera, sera’ prompts reflection on the thematic aspects of the play, as the lyrics suggest the terrifying yet hopeful notion that the future is uncertain, and that we are not always in control. 

The following excerpt and analysis demonstrates how sound, setting and lighting can all combine to create a powerful narrative effect and climax. 

Stage direction [Dolly]: She wails like a banshee. Rain, thunder, darkness. Time passes. The waters rise. END OF ACT ONE. 

  • Use of sound to create animal imagery and portray the attack on Dolly as barbaric and inhumane
  • The setting of the storm and river emphasise and reflect Dolly’s predicament as she feels like she is drowning and powerless. 
  • The dark lighting obscures the indecent act from the audience and emphasises the horror of the scene

Character Transformation

Character Transformation: In the final scene, Gladys takes back her agency – in her father’s absence she takes a stand on the stage to speak about  sovereignty, better housing conditions, and an end to segregation. Her “demand” represents the culmination of her transformation from the beginning of the play, where a dream sequence had represented her kneeling gracefully in front of the queen. The speech is also directed at us, the audience, transcending the barriers of time to remind us of the ongoing relevance of Gladys’ words as we watch the performance from lands whose sovereignty have yet to be ceded. 

Dialogue

Dialogue: Early on, Nan Dear explains that the government “forced [them] to leave Cummeragunja. Our home” (p. 15), alluding to the Soldier Settlement Scheme which forced Aboriginal people to move after their lands were given to returning white soldiers after World War Two. Whilst she later declares that “least here we do things our way” (p. 22), these dialogues suggest that the freedom espoused by this place comes at a cost – the trauma of displacement and the daily struggle of living in a hostile and stigmatised landscape. This is why Gladys clings to the promise of Rumbalara, an Aboriginal housing project in development. 

Symbolism

Symbolism is also employed by Harrison within the lines of dialogue, and a number of important symbols should be noted for analysis. 

Hessian Fence

The first is the hessian fence which separates the ‘humpies’ from the main roads during the Queen’s visit. The fence symbolises segregation and a willed blindness to the shameful conditions enforced upon Aboriginal people by white settlers. Gladys refers to it metaphorically as being like “a bandaid over a sore,” suggesting the avoidance of white authorities to address the housing situation. 

Colour White

The colour white is also used symbolically, and white objects such as the gloves that Gladys wears, Dolly’s shoes, the Ajax cleaning agent, skin whitening cream and the white walls of the Rumbalara housing all serve as reminders of white hegemony within Australian society. In other words, whiteness is always presented as superior and desirable, as ‘cleaner’ and more dignified. Harrison symbolically employs these white objects to criticise assimilation policies and attitudes which promoted the idea that Indigenous and non-white people should aspire to be more like white (Anglo-Saxon) people.

Encyclopedias

Another symbol to consider is the encyclopedias, which represent white epistemologies (ways of knowing). They are written by Anglo-Saxons and contain the body of knowledge accumulated by white people, which is again presented as objectively superior. It is because of this reason that Gladys believes her daughter will be more academically successful if she reads the encyclopedias, as she acknowledges that these are the forms of knowledge valued by white institutions. It may also be said that the encyclopedias are symbolic of Gladys’ dreams to see her daughter achieve an education and succeed in society. Nonetheless, through Nan Dear’s ironic comment “Encyclops boy and he knows nothing!” (p. 55) Harrison challenges the superiority of white epistemologies and exposes how Indigenous knowledge (especially of the land) has been undervalued and ignored.

Rainbow's End — Jane Harrison — Revision table

Category Explanation & effect Key evidence
Context
1950s Australia: segregation & the Aboriginal Protection Act Set in 1950s Victoria — an era of formal racial segregation and the Aboriginal Protection Act of 1909, which placed Aboriginal communities under strict government control. Indigenous people could be removed from their lands, their movements restricted, and their children taken. Harrison uses this context to show that the oppression the Dear family faces is systemic and legal, not merely interpersonal. The Inspector and Rent Collector — institutional surveillance embodying the Protection Act's paternalistic control.

Stolen Generation allusions — the Inspector always threatens the children first; ongoing terror.
Cummeragunja & the Soldier Settlement Scheme After WWII, the Soldier Settlement Scheme forcibly displaced Aboriginal communities — including Cummeragunja — to give land to returning white soldiers. The Dear family's presence in the humpies is the direct consequence of this dispossession. Nan Dear's trauma is rooted in this history: the freedom of the humpies is real, but it came at enormous cost. Nan Dear "They forced us to leave Cummeragunja" — displacement as the foundation of the family's present precarity.

"least here [in the humpies] we do things our way" — partial freedom purchased through dispossession and stigma.
The Queen's visit & terra nullius Queen Elizabeth II's first visit to Australia in 1954 provides the play's backdrop. The radio broadcaster's proclamation of Centennial Park as the "birthplace of the nation" exposes the myth of terra nullius — the false colonial claim that Australia was unoccupied before British settlement. The hessian fence erected to prevent the Queen from seeing the Aboriginal settlement is Harrison's most pointed symbol. Radio broadcaster: "birthplace of the nation" — terra nullius myth broadcast as national celebration.

Hessian fence — segregation made physical; the state hiding Indigenous reality from the colonial gaze.
Ongoing relevance Harrison wrote the play in 2007 but explicitly frames its concerns as continuous with the present. The play refuses to let audiences locate racism and dispossession safely in the past. Australia's status as the only Commonwealth nation without a treaty with its First Nations peoples signals that the "rainbow's end" remains unreached. Settlement bulldozed at the play's end — continuity of dispossession; no resolution, no treaty.

Harrison's own words — the play as commentary on contemporary self-determination struggles.
Themes
Racism & segregation Harrison depicts racism operating through three distinct mechanisms: paternalism (the infantilising view that Indigenous people cannot care for themselves, embodied by the Inspector); assimilation (the demand to abandon culture to access opportunity); and segregation (physical and social exclusion). All three are exposed as interconnected instruments of the same colonial project. Gladys "why do we have to prove we can live like whitefellas, before we get the same opportunities?" — assimilation's impossible double bind.

Nan Dear served last at the butcher — everyday segregation as lived reality.

Gladys "as if we chose to live on a floodplain" — scapegoating of Indigenous people for conditions imposed upon them.
Dreams & ambition Dreams are the play's central emotional engine and its central site of conflict. Dolly dreams of love and self-determination; Gladys dreams of better housing through Rumbalara; Nan Dear, shaped by decades of trauma, is deeply sceptical. Harrison treats Nan Dear's cynicism with empathy, but simultaneously asks audiences to consider how intergenerational trauma can become a barrier to future dreams. Dolly's dreams constantly under threat — from societal barriers and family pressure simultaneously.

Gladys's hope for Rumbalara shattered — the inadequacy of the "solution" offered by the state.

Nan Dear's cynicism — trauma as both understandable and limiting.
Sovereignty Sovereignty operates at two levels — political and bodily. At the political level, the Dear family is entirely at the mercy of white institutions. The bitter irony of Indigenous people treated as foreigners on their own land is made explicit when Gladys declares "I'm not an interloper — I belong here — this is my land!" Gladys "I'm not an interloper — I belong here — this is my land!" — sovereignty claimed against colonial dispossession.

"at the whim of government, at the mercy of Protection Boards, at the vagary of landlords and property owners" — the multiplicity of institutions denying sovereignty.
Gender & bodily sovereignty Harrison conducts an intersectional analysis — her female characters suffer the compounded consequences of both racism and misogyny. Nan Dear, Ester, and Dolly all experience violence at the hands of men. Harrison foregrounds the voices of Indigenous women who have been systematically silenced from historical narratives. Violence against Nan Dear, Ester, and Dolly — intersecting racism and misogyny as systemic, not exceptional.

Dolly's cousin grabs her arm — stichomythia and stormy sound design emphasise loss of bodily agency.
Family Harrison contrasts Aboriginal and Anglo-Saxon understandings of family: for Nan Dear, family is a multigenerational community that includes cousins; for Errol, family is a nuclear unit one grows out of. Family is paradoxically both a source of support and a site of constraint — dreams clash with family expectations, and characters must choose between themselves and their community. Nan Dear's shock at Errol's nuclear family conception — cultural contrast in the meaning of kinship.

Dolly's dreams constrained by family expectations as much as by racism — the double bind of belonging.
Characters
Dolly Dear The play's moral and emotional centre. Dolly's coming-of-age story mirrors the political struggle for Indigenous sovereignty — her fight to retain agency over herself and her dreams is the personal scale of the play's political argument. She is caught between the world Nan Dear has known and the world Gladys aspires to. Dolly's pregnancy — future generation; the stakes of the political struggle made personal.

Dolly's assault — bodily sovereignty denied; her story as microcosm of Indigenous women's experience.
Gladys Dear The play's political voice — aspirational, activist, determined to pursue change through legitimate channels. Gladys occupies a difficult position: she pushes back against racist systems while also placing pressure on her daughter and mother to present themselves acceptably to white institutions. She has internalised some of the system's demands even as she resists it. Gladys "why do we have to prove we can live like whitefellas, before we get the same opportunities?"

Gladys "I'm not an interloper — I belong here — this is my land!" — sovereignty claimed with fury.
Nan Dear The play's memory and its moral conscience. Nan Dear carries the full weight of historical dispossession — Cummeragunja, the Soldier Settlement Scheme, decades of surveillance and control. Her scepticism about white institutions is earned, not ignorant. Harrison presents her pessimism with profound empathy while also allowing audiences to see how intergenerational trauma can constrain future possibility. Nan Dear "They forced us to leave Cummeragunja" — historical dispossession as the foundation of her worldview.

"least here [in the humpies] we do things our way" — hard-won autonomy on the margins.
Errol Errol is both a genuine romantic figure and a vehicle for the play's critique of paternalism. His desire to protect and provide for Dolly reflects genuine affection, but Harrison positions it as also reflecting the broader paternalistic attitude of white Australia — the assumption that Indigenous people need white intervention to access a "better life." Errol's desire to give Dolly a "better life" — paternalism embedded in romantic feeling.

Dolly knowing the relationship "cannot work" — the social reality of segregation overriding personal love.
Form & Style
Coming-of-age structure The play is structured as a coming-of-age story centred on Dolly — but Harrison makes her individual growth inseparable from a collective political struggle. Dolly's loss of innocence mirrors the community's ongoing dispossession; her fight for self-determination mirrors the broader Indigenous rights movement. The personal is always political in Rainbow's End. Dolly's arc — personal agency and political sovereignty as parallel struggles throughout the play.
Stichomythia & sound design Harrison uses stichomythia — rapid, line-by-line dialogue exchange — to heighten dramatic tension at key moments of conflict. The stormy sound design amplifies Dolly's loss of agency during her assault, externalising her psychological state through the natural world. Dolly's assault scene — stichomythia and storm sound design enact loss of bodily sovereignty.
The hessian fence as staging symbol The hessian fence erected to hide the Aboriginal settlement from the Queen's view makes segregation literal and spatial — the state constructing a barrier to conceal its own oppression. On stage, it divides the playing space, giving physical form to the social division between the Dear family's world and the world passing just beyond. Hessian fence — segregation as architecture; the state hiding Indigenous reality from its own monarch.

Visual staging — the fence divides space on stage, making social division physically present for the audience.
Radio as dramatic device The radio voice — broadcasting the Queen's visit, proclaiming Centennial Park the "birthplace of the nation" — intrudes into the Dear family's domestic space as the voice of colonial Australia. Harrison uses it to expose terra nullius as an ongoing ideology, not just a historical policy. Radio broadcaster proclaims "birthplace of the nation" — terra nullius myth as live broadcast.

Radio's intrusion into domestic space — colonial narrative literally entering the Indigenous home.
Three-generation structure By centring the play on three generations of women — Nan Dear, Gladys, and Dolly — Harrison maps the full arc of colonialism's impact: from the direct trauma of dispossession, through the generation of activist resistance, to the coming-of-age generation navigating both inheritances. Colonialism's effects are not historical but living, carried in the body and the family across time. Nan Dear, Gladys, and Dolly — three generations as structural spine; colonialism's continuity mapped through the female line.

Each woman's relationship to dreams and trauma differs — but all three are shaped by the same dispossession.

Quiz Time!

What is Rainbow's End about?

Click to reveal answer

Rainbow's End is a 2007 play by Jane Harrison set in 1950s Australia. It follows three Indigenous women — Nan Dear, Gladys, and Dolly — navigating racism, dispossession, and dreams against the backdrop of the Queen's visit and the fight for Aboriginal housing rights.

How is gender explored in Rainbow's End?

Click to reveal answer

Harrison uses an intersectional lens to show how Indigenous women face compounded oppression based on both race and gender. Characters like Dolly and Nan Dear are denied bodily autonomy by both white authority figures and within their own community, exposing the violence of patriarchy.

What are the main themes of Rainbow's End?

Click to reveal answer

Key themes include racism and segregation, Indigenous sovereignty, dreams and resilience, family, and gender. Harrison explores how colonial systems — paternalism, assimilation, and segregation — continuously denied Indigenous Australians agency over their lives and land.

How does Rainbow's End explore Indigenous sovereignty?

Click to reveal answer

Harrison exposes the myth of terra nullius and the ongoing dispossession of First Nations people. From inspections to the settlement's bulldozing, the play shows how Indigenous Australians remained at the mercy of government and colonial institutions throughout the 1950s.

How does Harrison portray the role of dreams in Rainbow's End?

Click to reveal answer

Dreams drive the play's emotional core. Gladys dreams of better housing, Dolly dreams of personal freedom. Harrison shows how generational trauma and systemic racism crush these aspirations, while also asking audiences to imagine a future where Indigenous dreams are realised.